Home » Nutrient application guidelines for field, vegetable, and fruit crops in Wisconsin (A2809) » Soybean Nutrient Application Guidelines for Wisconsin
Soybean Nutrient Application Guidelines for Wisconsin
Soybean Nutrient Application Guidelines for Wisconsin
Soybean is a staple in Wisconsin cropping systems, with approximately 2.1-2.2 million acres of soybean harvested annually, representing about 24% of Wisconsin’s total harvested cropland acres (NASS, 2022). Statewide average soybean yield was 46 bushels per acre in 2017 and was 50.9 bushels per acre in 2022 (NASS, 2022). This chapter outlines the University of Wisconsin nutrient application recommendations for soybean.
Target Soil pH
The target soil pH for soybean production on mineral soils is 6.3; which is slightly higher than that for corn (6.0), but lower than the target pH for forage legumes (6.5-6.8). On organic soils, the target pH is 5.6. If the current field average soil pH is greater than 0.2 units below the target, lime should be applied. It is recommended to manage soil pH based on the highest target pH-crop in the crop rotation. See A2809’s Soil pH and Lime Requirements section for more information on pH, buffer pH, and lime recommendations.
Nitrogen
Research in Wisconsin suggests that nitrogen applications are not necessary for soybean production.
Phosphorus and Potassium
Soybean is classified as demand level 1 for phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) (see Appendix B for more information regarding demand levels and Wisconsin’s P/K management approach). Soil test P (STP) and K (STK) should be managed for the highest demand level crop in the rotation. Soil test interpretation for demand level 1 crops, soybean P2O5 and K2O removal coefficients, and P2O5 and K2O fertilizer rate guidelines are provided below.
Summary
Optimum STP is 17-24 and 26-33ppm, while optimum STK is 121-150 and 66-90ppm, for loamy and sandy soils, respectively. Nutrient removal estimates, in combination with realistic yield goals, are used in developing application rate guidelines.
Soils testing in the optimum range results in application rates that match expected crop removal to maintain current soil test levels.
Soils testing low or very low results in application rates that exceed crop removal to build up STP/STK levels into the optimum range over a 4-to-8-year period.
Conversely, soils testing above optimum (high for P and K; very high for K) result in application rates below crop removal to slowly draw soil test levels down into the optimum range.
Applications of P/K are not recommended when soil test levels are in the excessively high category due to very low probabilities of profitable crop response to additional nutrient.
Soil Test Interpretation Categories
Table 1. Soil test phosphorus (STP) interpretation categories for loamy and sandy-group soils for demand level 1 crops, including soybean
| Soil Group* | STP Very Low (VL) ppm** | STP Low (L) ppm** | STP Optimum (O) ppm** | STP High (H) ppm** | STP Excessively High (EH) ppm** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loamy | < 11 | 11 – 16 | 17 – 24 | 25 – 32 | > 32 |
| Sandy | < 15 | 15 – 25 | 26 – 33 | 34 – 45 | > 45 |
** Soil test values displayed are for the Bray-1 extraction and colorimetric determination method.
Table 2. Soil test phosphorus (STK) interpretation categories for loamy and sandy-group soils for demand level 1 crops, including soybean
| Soil Group* | STK Very Low (VL) ppm** | STK Low (L) ppm** | STK Optimum (O) ppm** | STK High (H) ppm** | STK Very High (VH) ppm** | STK Excessively High (EH) ppm** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loamy | < 81 | 81 – 120 | 121 – 150 | 151 – 200 | 201 – 250 | > 250 |
| Sandy | < 45 | 45 – 65 | 66 – 90 | 91 – 130 | – | > 130 |
** Soil test values displayed are for the Bray-1 extraction and colorimetric determination method.
Note: If the field where soybeans are being produced will be irrigated, use the STP/STK interpretation ranges for demand level 2 crops
Soybean P2O5 and K2O Removal Rates
Table 3. Soybean P2O5 and K2O removal coefficients for soybean.
Soybean is considered a demand level 1 crop as it relates to P & K fertility management.
| Crop | Yield Range | Reporting Moisture | P2O5 Removal Rate | K2O Removal Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean grain | 15 – 105 | 13% | 0.80 lbs. per bushel | 1.26 lbs. per bushel |
| Soybean straw1 | 2 – 4 ton | DM | 5.10 lbs. per ton | 38.70 lbs. per ton |
Phosphorus (P2O5) Application Rate Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Table 4a. Soybean grain P2O5 application rate guidelines across different soil test categories and realistic yield goals.
| Yield Goal bushels | STP Very Low (VL) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Low (L) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Optimum (O) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP High (H) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Excessively High (EH) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 – 25 | 55 | 45 | 15 | 10 | 0 |
| 26 – 35 | 65 | 55 | 25 | 15 | 0 |
| 36 – 45 | 70 | 60 | 30 | 15 | 0 |
| 46 – 55 | 80 | 70 | 40 | 20 | 0 |
| 56 – 65 | 90 | 80 | 50 | 25 | 0 |
| 66 – 75 | 95 | 85 | 55 | 30 | 0 |
| 76 – 85 | 105 | 95 | 65 | 35 | 0 |
| 86 -95 | 110 | 100 | 70 | 35 | 0 |
| 96 – 105 | 120 | 110 | 80 | 40 | 0 |
Table 4b. Soybean grain and straw P2O5 application rate guidelines across different soil test categories and realistic yield goals.
| Yield Goal bushels | STP Very Low (VL) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Low (L) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Optimum (O) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP High (H) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply | STP Excessively High (EH) lbs. P2O5 per acre to apply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 – 25 | 75 | 60 | 30 | 15 | 0 |
| 26 – 35 | 85 | 70 | 40 | 20 | 0 |
| 36 – 45 | 90 | 75 | 45 | 25 | 0 |
| 46 – 55 | 100 | 85 | 55 | 30 | 0 |
| 56 – 65 | 110 | 95 | 65 | 35 | 0 |
| 66 – 75 | 115 | 100 | 70 | 35 | 0 |
| 76 – 85 | 125 | 110 | 80 | 40 | 0 |
| 86 -95 | 130 | 115 | 85 | 45 | 0 |
| 96 – 105 | 140 | 125 | 95 | 50 | 0 |
Potassium (K2O) Application Rate Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Table 5a. Soybean grain K2O application rate guidelines across different soil test categories and realistic yield goals.
| Yield Goal bushels | STP Very Low (VL) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Low (L) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Optimum (O) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP High (H) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Very High (VH) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Excessively High (EH) lbs. K2O per acre to apply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 – 25 | 70 | 55 | 25 | 15 | 5 | 0 |
| 26 – 35 | 85 | 70 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 0 |
| 36 – 45 | 95 | 80 | 50 | 25 | 15 | 0 |
| 46 – 55 | 110 | 95 | 65 | 35 | 15 | 0 |
| 56 – 65 | 120 | 105 | 75 | 40 | 20 | 0 |
| 66 – 75 | 135 | 120 | 90 | 45 | 25 | 0 |
| 76 – 85 | 145 | 130 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 0 |
| 86 -95 | 160 | 145 | 115 | 60 | 30 | 0 |
| 96 – 105 | 170 | 155 | 125 | 65 | 30 | 0 |
Table 5b. Soybean grain and straw K2O application rate guidelines across different soil test categories and realistic yield goals.
| Yield Goal bushels | STP Very Low (VL) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Low (L) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Optimum (O) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP High (H) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Very High (VH) lbs. K2O per acre to apply | STP Excessively High (EH) lbs. K2O per acre to apply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 – 25 | 185 | 170 | 140 | 70 | 35 | 0 |
| 26 – 35 | 200 | 185 | 155 | 80 | 40 | 0 |
| 36 – 45 | 210 | 195 | 165 | 85 | 40 | 0 |
| 46 – 55 | 225 | 210 | 180 | 90 | 45 | 0 |
| 56 – 65 | 235 | 220 | 190 | 95 | 50 | 0 |
| 66 – 75 | 250 | 235 | 205 | 105 | 50 | 0 |
| 76 – 85 | 260 | 245 | 215 | 110 | 55 | 0 |
| 86 -95 | 275 | 260 | 230 | 115 | 60 | 0 |
| 96 – 105 | 285 | 270 | 240 | 120 | 60 | 0 |
Potassium (K2O) Application Rate Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
In addition to Tables 4 and 5 above, P2O5 and K2O rate recommendation equations are also provided here. Simply select the correct soil test interpretation category and insert a realistic soybean grain yield goal into the P2O5 or K2O equation to determine a specific application rate recommendation (units = lb of nutrient per acre).
Table 6. Soybean P2O5 and K2O application rate equations.
| Soil Test Category | Pounds P2O5 per acre to apply1,2 | Pounds K2O per acre to apply1,2 |
|---|---|---|
| Very Low (VL) | (0.80 * Yield Goal) + 40 | (1.26 * Yield Goal) + 45 |
| Low (L) | (0.80 * Yield Goal) + 30 | (1.26 * Yield Goal) + 30 |
| Optimum (O) | 0.80 * Yield Goal | 1.26 * Yield Goal |
| High (H) | 0.40 * Yield Goal | 0.63 * Yield Goal |
| Very High (VH) – K only | – | 0.32 * Yield Goal |
| Excessively High (EH) | 0 | 0 |
2 The “+ #” terms represent “build rates”; the amount of nutrient applied above expected crop removal to build up soil test levels into the optimum range over a 4-to-8-year period.
Secondary and Micronutrient Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Nutrient application guidelines for secondary and micro-nutrients to soybean are generally limited to nutrients where soybean have a medium or high relative demand and when soil and/or plant analysis suggest a deficiency may be present. From research trials in the state, profitable soybean yield responses to added secondary and micronutrients are rare.
Secondary Nutrients
Calcium and Magnesium Fertilizer Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Deficiencies of calcium (Ca) or magnesium (Mg) are not commonly observed in Wisconsin soybean production. Effective soil Ca and Mg management is primarily done via managing soil pH with standard ag-lime (calcium carbonate) or dolomitic limestone (Ca-Mg carbonate). See this page for more general information related to optimal soil test levels.
Sulfur Fertilizer Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Soybean (grain) has a low relative sulfur (S) requirement, meaning that soybean will rarely respond to S fertilizer applications. Sulfur deficiencies are most likely to occur on coarse textured soils, soils with low organic matter (<2.0%), or those with no recent manure history. In these situations, and where a deficiency is expected, application rates of 10 to 25 lb S/ac may be required. Sulfur applications are generally not required on medium and fine textured soils with moderate organic matter content (≥ 2.0%) or on those with a recent manure history.
Micronutrients
Manganese Fertilizer Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Soybean has a high relative manganese (Mn) requirement. Generally, soybean Mn deficiencies occur most commonly on calcareous muck soils; they are rarely observed in any other field setting. If a Mn deficiency is suspected, and soil test Mn is in the “low” category, apply 5 lb Mn/ac in the row (sulfate or ammonium forms will enhance availability); chelate forms are not effective when soil applied. Foliar applications of 1.25 or 0.2 lb Mn/ac of sulfate or chelate forms, respectively, are also effective. Research has shown that foliar applications of Mn to soybean fields that were not exhibiting Mn deficiency symptoms and had more than 30 ppm Mn in a tissue sample taken at the R1 growth stage did not result in yield increases
Zinc Fertilizer Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Soybean has a medium relative zinc (Zn) requirement. Observed Zn deficiencies in soybean are rare in Wisconsin. If soil test Zn is low, and if plant analysis confirms a suspected Zn deficiency, Zn should be applied to soybean. Band (2-4 lb/ac; 0.5-1.0 lb/ac if chelated form) or broadcast (4-8 lb/ac; 1-2 lb/ac if chelated form) applications are effective. Foliar applications of 1.0 lb/ac of zinc sulfate or 0.15 lb/ac of zinc chelate may also be effective.
Boron and Copper Fertilizer Recommendations for Wisconsin Soybeans
Soybeans have a low relative boron (B) and copper (Cu) requirement, and observed deficiencies are uncommon. Boron deficiencies are likely to be more prominent on sandy soils due to lower natural B content and lower capacity to hold B than loamy soils. If soil test B is low, and plant analysis confirms a suspected B deficiency, soybean may respond to added B. Copper deficiency is generally only suspected on very acid soils, particularly mucks. For soybean, Cu application guidelines are only provided for organic soils, where band application rates of 2 lb Cu/ac (inorganic forms) or 0.3 lb Cu/ac (chelate forms) may correct deficiency.
Starter fertilizer research with soybean generally indicates little or no advantage to banded fertilizer treatments relative to broadcast. Seed-placed (pop-up) fertilizer is not advised due to the potential for seedling damage (salt-sensitivity).
Chapter Editors

Natasha Rayne, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist – Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management
Manure placement, timing, and nitrogen credits; organic soil amendments and nutrient cycling; climate-smart and site-specific nitrogen management; improvement of nitrogen use efficiency in cereal crop production.

Shawn Conley, Ph.D.
Professor and Extension Specialist – Soybean and Small Grains
Increasing the economic and environmental sustainability of Wisconsin soybean and small grain production through research, timely crop management recommendations, and more.
Updated: September 2026
