Skip to content
UW Madison Crest

Crops and Soils

Division of Extension

  • Topics
    • Economics, Budgets and Financials
    • Emerging Crops
    • Forage Production and Management
    • Fruit and Vegetable Production
    • Grain Production and Management
    • Grazing
    • On-Farm Research
      • Nitrogen Optimization Pilot Program
    • Pest Management
    • Soils, Nutrient Management, and Soil Health
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Forage and Cover Crop Field Day
    • Agronomy and Soils Field Day
    • Weed Management Workshop
    • WWASH Conference
    • Badger Crops and Soils Update Meetings
  • News
    • News
    • Get Connected
      • Wisconsin Crop Manager
      • Wisconsin Fruit News
    • Hay Market Report
    • Ag Weather Outlook for Wisconsin
  • Programs
    • Webinars
      • Badger Crop Connect
      • Emerging Crops Webinars
      • Focus on Forage
      • Foundational Crop Scouting Training
      • Vegetable Production Webinars
    • Podcasts
      • Field Notes
      • The Cutting Edge
  • Articles
  • People
  • About
  • Contact Us
Search
University of Wisconsin-Extension
Articles > Alfalfa

Managing Volunteer Wheat in Late-Summer Seeded Alfalfa

Written by Mark Renz, Chris Bloomingdale, Richard Proost and MICHAEL J BALLWEG
Share
  • Share:
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X (Twitter)
  • Share via Email
  • Copy Link

Copied!

Managing Volunteer Wheat in Late-Summer Seeded Alfalfa


Methods

Volunteer Wheat Control

Alfalfa Stem Density

Forage Yield

Forage Quality

Acceptable Thresholds for Volunteer Wheat in Alfalfa

Summary

Download PDF

Wheat is an important agronomic crop in the rotations of many Midwestern states and is often followed by a late-summer seeding of alfalfa.

In this situation, wheat seed not collected in the combine becomes a weed and impacts alfalfa establishment and productivity, especially in no-till and reduced-till fields. Previous research in Wisconsin has shown that volunteer wheat can reduce alfalfa density by up to 50%, resulting in shorter alfalfa stand life and reduced forage quality the following spring.

This past research documented that a well-timed application of sethoxydim (Poast Plus) during establishment in the fall, when wheat is less than 6 inches tall, can alleviate this impact and provide excellent control (see photo below).

This research (done between 2008-2010) led to further questions about managing volunteer wheat in alfalfa:

  • Does glyphosate (Roundup) in Roundup Ready Alfalfa or imazamox (Raptor) provide similar control as sethoxydim (Poast Plus)?
  • Is performance maximized when applied to volunteer wheat that is less than or equal to 6 to 6-½ inches tall?
  • What level of volunteer wheat control is needed to prevent impact on alfalfa establishment while maximizing forage productivity and quality for dairy-based systems?

A well-timed herbicide application during alfalfa
establishment in the fall can provide excellent control of volunteer winter wheat

Flagged alfalfa research plot surrounded by green winter wheat

Methods

To address these questions, a study was initiated in 2015 at three locations across Wisconsin to compare the effectiveness of Roundup (glyphosate), Raptor (imazamox) and Poast Plus (sethoxydim) in controlling volunteer wheat in alfalfa. Research sites were located in central, eastern and southwestern parts of the state.

Roundup Ready alfalfa was seeded into fields where winter wheat was harvested earlier that summer. Roundup WeatherMAX at 22 fl oz per acre, Poast Plus at 2.25 pt per acre, and Raptor at 4 fl oz per acre were compared to an untreated control at all three locations.

Adjuvants were used per label recommendations for each product. Early applications were made when wheat was 4-6 inches tall, and alfalfa was at the 2-3 trifoliate leaf stage; the later application was made 12-20 days later, when wheat was 6-12 inches tall.

Results are averaged across all three locations.

Volunteer Wheat Control

By 28 days after treatment (late October – early November), both herbicide treatments and timings of application affected control of volunteer wheat (P < 0.05). Roundup controlled volunteer wheat the best (100%), followed by Poast Plus (88%) and Raptor (66%).

Roundup and Poast Plus control was maintained through spring as cover of volunteer wheat was less than 5% present. Raptor treated plots had on average half the cover of untreated plots (65%) [data not shown]. Although an earlier application timing provided better volunteer wheat control, it averaged less than 10% improvement versus the later timing [data not shown].

Figure 1. Percent Weed Control 28 Days After Treatment

Roundup
100% (a)
Poast Plus
88% (b)
Raptor
66% (c)
Control
0.05% (d)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent (%) Weed Control (28 days after treatment)

Data Table ↓

HerbicidePercent Weed Control
(28 days after treatment)
Roundup100%
Poast Plus88%
Raptor66%
Control0.05%

Alfalfa Stem Density

April alfalfa stem density increased with herbicide and the early application timing compared to the untreated areas (P < 0.05).

Stem density was greatest with Roundup resulting in the highest stem density (83 stems per ft2) followed by Poast Plus applied early (72 stems per ft2). Stem density from Raptor treatments and untreated areas were, on average, unacceptable as stem density was below the recommended levels for established alfalfa fields of 55 stems per ft2.

Low stem density from Raptor treatments was likely due to the variable and poor volunteer wheat control and could be improved if higher rates and/or an earlier application timing is used. Application timing also influenced stem density, with early application timings providing 22% greater stem density compared to later timings [data not shown].

Figure 2. Spring Alfalfa Stem Density After Herbicide Applications

Roundup
83.4 (a)
Poast Plus
72.0 (b)
Raptor
52.9 (c)
Control
26.3 (d)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Stems per ft² (April)

Data Table ↓

HerbicideApril Alfalfa Stem Density
(stems per ft2)
Roundup83.4
Poast Plus72
Raptor52.9
Control26.3

Forage Yield

Yield in May was 0.5-0.6 tons of dry matter per acre higher in the Raptor and untreated plots compared to Poast Plus and Roundup (P < 0.05).

Increased forage in the Raptor and untreated plots was from volunteer wheat biomass, as it averaged 84% and 53% of the total forage biomass.

Forage biomass from the Roundup and Poast Plus treatments, in contrast, were mostly alfalfa with, on average, 5% and 16% wheat biomass, respectively.

Figure 3. May Alfalfa and Weed Dry Matter Yields

Roundup
Alfalfa: 1.62 Weed:
0.08
1.70b
Poast Plus
Alfalfa: 1.32 Weed: 0.33 1.64b
Raptor
Alfalfa: 1.00 Weed: 1.14 2.14a
Control
Alfalfa: 0.33 Weed: 1.86 2.19a
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
Yield Tons per Acre (May)

Data Table ↓

HerbicideAlfalfa Yield Tons Per AcreWeed Yield Tons Per AcreTotal Yield Tons Per Acre
Roundup1.620.081.70
Poast Plus1.320.331.64
Raptor1.001.142.14
Control0.331.862.19

Forage Quality

Crude protein and relative feed quality (RFQ) were maximized, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) minimized when Roundup or Poast Plus were utilized, regardless of timing.

Due to these differences, milk per ton of forage calculated used the 2016 MILK* model was highest in Roundup and Poast Plus treatments. In contrast, milk per acre was highest in non-treated and Raptor treatments due to the increased biomass.

Table 1. Forage Quality Averaged Across Three Locations When Volunteer Wheat Was Managed by One of Three Herbicides

TreatmentCrude ProteinADFNDFRFQMilk per ton of forageMilk per acre of forage
Roundup (glyphosate)21.6a30.2b375c184a3190a5405b
Poast Plus
(sethoxydim)
20.9a30.3b38.9c178a3169a5200b
Raptor
(imazamox)
16.7b32.1a47.0b152b3030b6412a
Control
(non-treated)
14.0c32.7a51.5a138c3010b6967a
(P value = <0.01)

*Dan Undersander, former University of Wisconsin–Madison Extension Agronomy Professor, developed the MILK model method for estimating milk per ton of forage dry matter (DM) as an index of forage quality of alfalfa and grasses. 

Acceptable Thresholds for Volunteer Wheat in Alfalfa

In developing a threshold, one must consider the benefits of volunteer wheat to forage production as well as the reduction in forage quality and impact on alfalfa stand establishment. While yield and resulting milk per acre were highest in uncontrolled areas the following spring, the forage quality and resulting milk per ton of forage is reduced. Additionally, stem density is reduced if volunteer wheat is not controlled, potentially impacting alfalfa stand life.

We found that at least 60% control of volunteer wheat was needed to, on average, meet the minimum alfalfa stand stem density that will allow for maximum yield (55 stems per ft2). The relationship was linear, and for every increase in control by 10%, an increase of 6 stems per ft2 was observed.

Thus, higher yields can be expected in the first harvest in spring if winter wheat is not controlled, but the forage quality will be reduced, and wheat presence could reduce alfalfa stand life.

To offset these conflicting results, we recommend producers aim to keep volunteer wheat less than 35% of the total forage. This translates to 70% or better control in the fall. To obtain these levels of control, several herbicides could be utilized at a range of timings.

Summary

Results across three locations confirm that volunteer wheat can impact summer seedings of alfalfa. Applications of Roundup or Poast Plus to volunteer wheat that was 4-6 inches tall provided the best control in these experiments 28 days after treatment and the following spring with minimal amounts of volunteer wheat in the total forage.

As the volunteer wheat does have value as a forage, its presence in the forage can increase milk production per acre; however, this impacts the alfalfa stem density and long-term stand life of the alfalfa.

Based on our results, we recommend that producers prevent volunteer wheat from becoming more than 35% of the total forage the following spring. This would translate to 70% control of volunteer wheat 28 days after application.

Agricultural test plot with red outlines labeled A and B comparing alfalfa growth across field sections marked with small orange flags.

Plot A (left): Untreated alfalfa plot with volunteer winter wheat.
Plot B (right): Roundup-treated alfalfa plot.

This publication is intended for download, local use, or for print.

2018_VolunteerWW_Alfalfa_webDownload

Originally Published: 2018
Reviewed by:
Dan H. Smith, UW–Madison Extension weed science outreach specialist

Return to Top

Print This Page

You May Also Like

  • ▶ 2026 Mid-Summer Alfalfa and Forage Update▶ 2026 Mid-Summer Alfalfa and Forage Update
  • ▶ Managing Waterhemp in Spring Alfalfa Seedings▶ Managing Waterhemp in Spring Alfalfa Seedings
  • Pricing Standing AlfalfaPricing Standing Alfalfa
  • 2025 Wisconsin Alfalfa Yield and Persistence Program Results2025 Wisconsin Alfalfa Yield and Persistence Program Results

Division of Extension

Connecting people with the University of Wisconsin

  • Agriculture
  • Community Development
  • Health & Well-Being
  • Families & Finances
  • Natural Resources
  • Positive Youth Development
University of Wisconsin-Madison      |        Explore Extension: Agriculture Community Development Families & Finances Health Natural Resources Youth
Connect With Us
Support Extension
Extension Home

We teach, learn, lead and serve, connecting people with the University of Wisconsin, and engaging with them in transforming lives and communities.

Explore Extension »

County Offices

Connect with your County Extension Office »

Map of Wisconsin counties
Staff Directory

Find an Extension employee in our staff directory »

staff directory
Social Media

Get the latest news and updates on Extension's work around the state

facebook iconFacebook

twitter icon Follow on X


Facebook
Follow on X

Feedback, questions or accessibility issues: info@extension.wisc.edu | © 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement & How to File a Complaint | Disability Accommodation Requests

The University of Wisconsin–Madison Division of Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming in compliance with state and federal law.