Skip to content
UW Crest

Crops and Soils

Division of Extension

  • Topics
    • Economics, Budgets and Financials
    • Emerging Crops
    • Forage Production and Management
    • Fruit and Vegetable Production
    • Grain Production and Management
    • Grazing
    • On-Farm Research
      • Nitrogen Optimization Pilot Program
    • Pest Management
    • Soils, Nutrient Management, and Soil Health
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • UW Forage and Cover Crop Field Day
    • Agronomy and Soils Field Day
    • Wisconsin Extension Weed Management Workshop
    • WWASH Conference
    • Badger Crops and Soils Update Meetings
  • News
    • News
    • Get Connected
      • The Wisconsin Crop Manager
    • Hay Market Report
    • Ag Weather Outlook for Wisconsin
  • Programs
    • Webinars
      • Badger Crop Connect
      • Emerging Crops Webinars
      • Focus on Forage
      • Foundational Crop Scouting Training
      • Vegetable Production Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • People
  • About
  • Contact Us
Search
University of Wisconsin-Extension
Articles > Small Grains

Soil Fertility Overview for Small Grain Production in Wisconsin: A one-stop shop

Written by Chris Bandura, Anastasia Kurth, WILL FULWIDER, Dane Elmquist and Sam Bibby
Share
  • Share:
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X (Twitter)
  • Share via Email
  • Copy Link

Copied!

Soil Fertility Overview for Small Grain Production in Wisconsin: A one-stop shop


Soil pH Considerations

Phosphorus & Potassium Fertilizer Recommendations

Nitrogen Fertilizer Considerations

Sulfur Considerations

Determining Sulfur Need in Small Grain Crops

As with any other crop, fertilizer is an important aspect of management in small grain production. Nutrients are vital for crop development and yield outcomes, but they are also an input cost that should be optimized for profit; not yield alone. This document serves as a centralized resource containing soil fertility information from UW-Madison, Extension, and Nutrient and Pest Management (NPM) resources (see resources section below for more information). 

Soil pH Considerations for Small Grain Production

Soil pH is one of the most important soil fertility properties to consider as it impacts the nutrient availability to your crops. It also impacts soil microbial communities. Generally, the optimal soil pH for small grain production ranges from 5.6 to 6.6; with a specific target pH that optimizes crop performance for each individual crop (Table 1). 

Table 1. Target pH values for specific small grain crops

CropTarget pH (Mineral Soils)
Barley, grain6.6
Oat, grain5.8
Rye, grain5.6
Triticale6
Wheat, grain6
Table 1. Optimum target pH values for small-grain crops in Wisconsin (Adapted from Table 5.1 in UW-Extension Publication A2809). 

Keep in mind, however, that soil pH should be managed based on the crop with the highest target pH in your rotation. Wheat, for example, has a target pH of 6.0; however, if soybean is in the crop rotation, the rotation’s target pH would be 6.3 (6.3 is the target pH of soybean). It generally makes more economic sense to manage pH, and therefore lime, in this way. For additional, generalized, information related to liming, see Chapter 5 in Extension Publication A2809).  

Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer Recommendations

Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizer rate recommendations are determined based on several pieces of information including: 1. Crop P and K demand level; 2. Recent soil test P and K levels; and 3. Expected yield.  

  1. Crop P and K demand levels (ranging from 1 to 4) are used as a method for grouping crops that have relatively similar P and K demand for optimal growth. Crops with a demand level of “1” need less P and K than those with a demand level of “4”. Small grains have a P and K demand level of “1”, indicating a relatively low P and K requirement compared to other crops. The only exception is wheat, where the demand level is “2”; suggesting that wheat requires slightly more P and K than other small grains due to higher nutrient removal rates.   
  2. Soil test P and K interpretations are available for specific crops based on their relative P and K demand level (as mentioned above) in addition to the soil type of the field. Separate ranges are provided for “Loamy” soils and for “Sandy or Organic” soils (Table 2a and Table 2b below). Similar to managing soil pH, however, it is recommended to manage soil test P and K levels based on the highest P and K demanding crop in your rotation. Use the P and K results from your most recent soil test lab report and reference them against the ranges provided in the table below to determine the appropriate interpretation category. 

Table 2a. P and K soil test interpretations for non-wheat small grain crops

 Very LowLowOptimumHighVery High*Excessively High
Soil GroupPKPKPKPK–KPK
Loamy<10<7010-1570-10016-20101-13021-30131-160–161-190>30>190
Sandy, Organic<12<4512-2245-6523-3266-9033-4291-130––>42>130

 

Table 2. Soil test interpretation categories for phosphorus and potassium for small-grain crops (adapted from Tables 7.1 and 7.2 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

All soil test P and K test values displayed have units of parts per million (ppm).
*The “Very High” soil test interpretation category is used for potassium only.

Table 2b. P and K soil test interpretations for wheat

 Very LowLowOptimumHighVery High*Excessively High
Soil GroupPKPKPKPK–KPK
Loamy<12<9012-1790-11018-25111-14026-35141-170–171-240>35>240
Sandy, Organic<18<5018-2550-8036-3781-12038-55121-160–161-200>55>200

 

Table 2. Soil test interpretation categories for phosphorus and potassium for small-grain crops (adapted from Tables 7.1 and 7.2 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

All soil test P and K test values displayed have units of parts per million (ppm).
*The “Very High” soil test interpretation category is used for potassium only.

  1. Phosphorus and potassium application rate recommendations for specific crops are based on current soil test levels (i.e. interpretation category) AND expected crop yield or yield goal. Generally, P and K application rate recommendations for soils testing in the “Optimum” category will match expected crop removal rates. For soils testing in the “low” or “very low” categories, recommended rates will exceed expected crop removal, with the goal of building soil test levels up to the optimum category over a period of 4 to 8 years. Conversely, for soils testing high or very high (for K), recommended rates are less than expected crop removal such that soil test levels will be “drawn down” to the optimum range over time.  

Lastly, it is important to account for the difference in nutrient removal (and therefore fertilizer rate recommendations) between when only the grain is being harvested compared to when the grain and the straw are being removed. See below for P and K rate recommendations for both harvest-scenarios for small grain crops in Wisconsin. 

Table 3a. P and K rate recommendations for barley (grain)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
25-5055451510604015105
51-7565552515655020105
76-100756535207560301510
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3b. P and K rate recommendations for barley (grain + straw)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
25-5075653520120105754020
51-7585754525130115854520
76-10095855530140125955025
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3c. P and K rate recommendations for oats (grain)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
30-605545151055401055
61-9060502010604515105
91-12070603015655020105
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3d. P and K rate recommendations for oats (grain + straw)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
30-60706030151501351055525
61-90807040201551401105530
91-120908050251601451156030
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3e. P and K rate recommendations for rye (grain)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
15-3050401055035550
31-505545151055401055
51-7065552515655020105
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3f. P and K rate recommendations for rye (grain + straw)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
15-30554515108570402010
31-50605020109075452510
51-70706030159580502515
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3g. P and K rate recommendations for triticale (grain)

Yield Goal (lb/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
1,000-5,000756535207560301510
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3h. P and K rate recommendations for triticale (grain + straw)

Yield Goal (lb/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
1,000-5,0008070402010590603015
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3i. P and K rate recommendations for wheat (grain)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
20-405545151065501055
41-6065552515756020105
61-8075653520806525155
81-100857545258570301510
101-120958555309580402010

Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Table 3j. P and K rate recommendations for wheat (grain + straw)

Yield Goal (bu/ac)P2O5 Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)K2O Rate Guidelines (lb/ac)
VLLOHVLLOHVH
20-4065552515120105653515
41-6075653520130115754020
61-8085754525125120804020
81-10095855530145130904525
101-120105956535150135955025
Table 3a-i. Phosphorus (P2O5) and potassium (K2O) application rate guidelines for common small-grain crops at several soil test interpretation levels. (Adapted from Table 7.4 in UW–Madison Extension Publication A2809). 

Nitrogen Fertilizer Considerations

NITROGEN (N) fertilizer rate recommendations are determined in a slightly different way than for P and K recommendations are, and the process is also different between wheat and all other small grain crops. For wheat, N rate recommendations are made by using a maximum return to N (MRTN) approach, while other small grain-N recommendations are made based on soil organic matter content. 

Nitrogen for wheat

The MRTN rate guidelines for wheat were developed by conducting wheat yield response to N trials in on-farm and agricultural research station settings in major wheat producing areas of Wisconsin over many years. Analysis of the yield response to N data resulted in determining the average N application rates that resulted in maximum economic return on the N investment. As such, it is important to recognize that a combination of both agronomic (i.e. wheat-yield response to N functions) and economic (i.e. cost of N, price of wheat) factors are utilized in the MRTN approach; not just one or the other. The MRTN approach emphasizes maximizing profitability, not maximizing yield. 

Additionally, it is recommended that N is applied in the spring at “green-up”, and that fall N applications are avoided due to the risk of denitrification and leaching over the winter months. 

To determine the appropriate N application rate for wheat, we need to know the soil group (e.g. Loamy, Sandy, or Organic; Table 4.1 in A2809), previous crop, and the N:Wheat price ratio. By utilizing the ratio between the price of N fertilizer ($ / lb of actual N) and the value of wheat grain ($ / lb grain), rate selections are applicable to current / near-future market conditions and can be dynamic as those markets change over time.  

Example N:Wheat price ratio calculation, assuming $0.50 / lb N and $5.00 / bu of wheat: 
N:Wheat price ratio = ($0.50 / lb N) ÷ ($5.00 / bu) = 0.10

Lower price ratios indicate market conditions where N fertilizer is relatively cheap and/or where wheat prices are relatively high. Conversely, higher price ratios reflect more expensive N fertilizer and/or lower wheat prices. For reference, a price ratio of 0.10 is “lower” than a price ratio of 0.15. Accounting for fluctuations in N cost and wheat price allows farmers to minimize overall financial risk. Figure 1 below provides an easy way to determine what the correct price ratio is for a range in N and wheat prices. 

Figure 1. N:Wheat Price Ratio Table

Figure 1. N:Wheat Price Ratio Table from UW-Madison Nutrient and Pest Management Publication ”Nutrient Management – Fast Facts Magazine“, Sept. 2024

Upon determining the N:Wheat price ratio, soil group (i.e. Loamy or Sandy), and previous crop, reference Figure 2 for deciding the N rate recommendation. Note that for each price ratio scenario, there is a range of N application rates provided. These ranges represent the rates of N fertilizer that result in profitability within +/- $1/ac of the economic optimum N rate (i.e. maximum economic return to N). Reference A2809 for additional details related to the MRTN approach and additional considerations for N rate selection for wheat. 

Figure 2. Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Wheat

Figure 2. University of Wisconsin Nitrogen Guidelines for Wheat (UW-Madison Nutrient and Pest Management Publication ”Nutrient Management – Fast Facts Magazine“, Sept. 2024.) 

Use of the pre-plant soil nitrate test (PPNT) to adjust MRTN recommendations in wheat

As seen above, it is recommended to utilize the PPNT on Loamy soils when wheat is following corn to further enhance the accuracy of N rate selections. The PPNT test is recommended because there may be significant amounts of residual soil nitrate leftover following corn harvest, especially if corn N uptake was reduced by drier-than-normal conditions or if N fertilizer application rates in corn were greater than crop need. Accounting for this residual nitrate will increase wheat N use efficiency, can increase profitability, and reduce the potential for excess nitrate leaching to groundwater.  

Additional information on the PPNT for wheat

PPNT sampling includes collecting soil samples in the late summer months from the 0-1 foot and 1-2 foot depths.  Fifteen cores from each depth should be collected and kept separate from an area of no more than 20 acres. Composite the cores for each individual depth and submit them to a laboratory as two separate samples for nitrate determination. Soils where the PPNT is less than 50 lb N/ac require higher N fertilizer application rates than those where the PPNT is between 51-100 lb N/ac (generally a difference of 25-30 lb N/ac). When the PPNT is greater than 100 lb N/ac, it is recommended that no additional N be applied from fertilizer. If the previous crop was corn and a PPNT was not taken, N rate guidelines for “PPNT < 50” should be followed. See A2809 for additional information related to the PPNT.  

Nitrogen rate guidelines for other small-grain crops are based on soil organic matter (% SOM) content of the predominant soil type in your field (Table 5). Nitrogen response data from research studies across a range of WI soils is insufficient to allow application of the MRTN approach for these crops. As such, a single N application rate recommendation is made for each crop, regardless of yield goal. As seen in Table 4 below, N application recommendations decrease with increasing SOM content; reflecting the N cycling ability of soils with greater SOM content.

Table 4. Nitrogen rate recommendations for non-wheat small grain crops

CropYield Range
(per acre)
Soil Organic Matter Content (% SOM)
<2.02.0-9.910.0-20.0>20.0
lb N/ac to apply
Barley25-100 bu70503015
Oat30-120 bu6040200
Rye15-70 bu6040200
Triticale1-5,000 lb6040200

Table 4. Nitrogen rate guidelines for small grain crops other than wheat. 

Sulfur Considerations

Sulfur (S) is considered a secondary nutrient in crop production as it is needed in slightly lower quantities compared to N, P, and K. Regardless, there are many instances in small-grain production where S fertilizer applications will likely result in positive yield responses. Additionally, it is important to note that S plays into crop N use as both nutrients are essential for amino acid and protein production. Providing crops with adequate amounts of S can help with overall use efficiency of applied N as well. There are several factors that impact S availability to crops including soil organic matter (SOM), clay content, atmospheric deposition, and manure history.  

Sulfur from soil organic matter

Generally, for every 1% of SOM, about 3 pounds of sulfur per acre are made available to crops. As such, soils with greater SOM content will require less S from fertilizer compared to soils with lower organic matter.  

Soil Texture Impacts Sulfur

Medium and fine-textured soils have greater sulfate-S (the plant available form of S) holding capacity than coarse-textured soils. The reason for this is 2-fold: 1. Sulfate-S can be bound to clay particles (i.e. medium/fine-textured soils have greater clay content than coarse textured); and 2. Sulfate is a mobile nutrient, meaning it can be leached from the soil profile, especially in coarse textured soils. In summary, coarse textured, low organic matter soils will have a greater probability of being S-deficient than higher organic matter medium and fine-textured soils.  

Atmospheric Deposition of Sulfur

Atmospheric deposition of S has decreased dramatically over the past few decades; resulting in an average annual S deposition rate of 3 to 10 pounds of S per acre in WI today which is about 1/3 of historical amounts received. As such, S deficiency has become more prevalent throughout the state. 

Manure History Impacts Sulfur

Given the relatively high amount of S present in manure (~1 lb/ton or ~1 lb/1,000 gal of 1st-year available S in dairy manure), fields with recent manure applications seldom show signs of S deficiency. That said, however, most crops will use the entirety of the manure-derived S within the first year of application; meaning don’t expect much residual S to carryover for subsequent crops. 

Determining Sulfur Need in Small Grain Crops

Soil tests for determining plant available S and subsequent S fertilizer application rates are not reliable tools, unlike those for P and K mentioned above (*note that S needs can be determined/verified by use of plant tissue analysis). Instead, it is recommended to consider the following when considering whether your crop needs S fertilizer: 1. Soil sulfate-S holding capacity; 2. Manure history; and 3. Relative Sulfur requirements of specific crops. If soil sulfate-S retention is low or medium (Table 5), and no manure has been applied in the past two years, a S application will most likely be needed for crops with a medium or high relative need for S (Table 6). 

Surface TextureSubsoil TexturePotential for Retaining Sulfate in Root Zone
SandySandyLow
SandyLoamyMedium
LoamySandyMedium
LoamyLoamyMedium
Organic–High
Table 5. Potential for soil to retain sulfate in the root zone. (Adapted from Table 8.1 in A2809). 
CropRelative Sulfur Requirement^
GrainGrain + Straw
BarleyLowMedium
OatLowMedium
RyeLowLow
TriticaleNo DataNo Data
WheatLowMedium

^ Relative sulfur requirement based on annual crop removal rates:
low < 10 lb S/a; medium = 10-20 lb S/a; high > 20 lb S/a

Table 6. Relative Sulfur requirement for small-grain crops in Wisconsin (Adapted from table 8.3 in A2809). 

If after considering the above you determine S is needed, it is generally recommended to apply a S rate of 10-25 pounds of S per acre to small-grain crops. These rates align with how relative sulfur requirements are defined in Table 7; meeting annual crop S removal rates. All sulfate forms (e.g. Gypsum, CaSO4; Ammonium Sulfate (AMS), NH4SO4) of fertilizer are equally effective when surface applied or incorporated. Keep in mind that elemental sulfur is unavailable to plants and needs to be converted to sulfate by soil biogeochemical processes before plants can use it.  

For additional information regarding soil fertility management for small-grain production, please see publication A2809 or the resources listed below. 

Other Resources

Nutrient Management Fast Facts Magazine

Small Grains in Wisconsin: Benefits, Management and Resources

Small Grains in Wisconsin

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates and Application Timing for Winter Wheat in Wisconsin: What are the economic optimums?

Wheat PPNT Validation

Fundamental Soil Fertility Strategies for Success in Corn, Soybean and Small Grains

Updated: May 6, 2025
Reviewed by: Shawn Conley, Dan Marzu

Print This Page

You May Also Like

  • ▶ Fall 2025 Financial Assistance for Producers▶ Fall 2025 Financial Assistance for Producers
  • ▶ Fall 2025 Ag Policy Update▶ Fall 2025 Ag Policy Update
  • ▶ Fall 2025 Corn and Soybean Market Outlook▶ Fall 2025 Corn and Soybean Market Outlook
  • ▶ Unlocking the Potential of Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Corn▶ Unlocking the Potential of Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Corn

Division of Extension

Connecting people with the University of Wisconsin

  • Agriculture
  • Community Development
  • Health & Well-Being
  • Families & Finances
  • Natural Resources
  • Positive Youth Development
University of Wisconsin-Madison      |        Explore Extension: Agriculture Community Development Families & Finances Health Natural Resources Youth
Connect With Us
Support Extension
Extension Home

We teach, learn, lead and serve, connecting people with the University of Wisconsin, and engaging with them in transforming lives and communities.

Explore Extension »

County Offices

Connect with your County Extension Office »

Map of Wisconsin counties
Staff Directory

Find an Extension employee in our staff directory »

staff directory
Social Media

Get the latest news and updates on Extension's work around the state

facebook iconFacebook

twitter icon Follow on X


Facebook
Follow on X

Feedback, questions or accessibility issues: info@extension.wisc.edu | © 2026 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement & How to File a Complaint | Disability Accommodation Requests

The University of Wisconsin–Madison Division of Extension provides equal opportunities in employment and programming in compliance with state and federal law.